Don’t just take our word for it. Here’s what our clients say.

The Client

An Engineering Group that had recently acquired a specialist manufacturer, bringing together two businesses with different Employee Benefits arrangements and working cultures.

The Situation

The acquisition created an opportunity to simplify the Group's benefits, but the two workforces were not starting from the same position. One had established Private Medical Insurance (PMI), including employees receiving ongoing treatment, while the other had a different policy, lower benefit levels and renewal arrangements.

The finance team wanted to reduce duplication, but a blanket consolidation risked creating complications for employees and their existing cover.

The Optima Solution

Rather than combining everything at the next renewal, we separated the review into individual benefit products.

We explored consolidating Group Life Assurance where insurer terms and eligibility requirements allowed, while recommending that the PMI arrangements remain separate where this better protected existing treatment commitments and avoided potential complications from combining claims experience.

We also identified differences in eligibility and cover that needed to be addressed before the Group could move towards a more consistent benefits structure.

The result was a practical integration plan that pursued efficiencies where they made sense without assuming that every benefit had to be identical across both businesses.
 

The Client

A growing Architect Business that had moved beyond its start-up phase and secured a significant commercial contract, creating an immediate need to recruit specialist employees and strengthen its employment offering.

The Situation

Until this point, recruitment had largely relied on competitive salaries, flexible working and the appeal of joining a growing business. Now the company was competing for experienced candidates against larger employers with established benefits packages.

The directors wanted to introduce Employee Benefits quickly, but had limited experience of the market and needed to decide what to offer first without committing to an unnecessarily expensive package.

The Optima Solution

We helped the company distinguish between benefits that provided essential financial protection and those that could be introduced as the business developed.

Group Life Assurance was considered as a foundation for protecting employees' families, while Group Income Protection was assessed for its role in providing financial support during longer-term incapacity. Private Medical Insurance was also explored as a potential recruitment differentiator, alongside more accessible wellbeing support.

Rather than introducing everything at once, we developed a phased approach based on the available budget, recruitment priorities, and likely workforce growth. We also considered eligibility rules and the practicalities of adding new employees as the company expanded.

The result was a clear starting point for an Employee Benefits package that could support recruitment immediately and grow with the business.
 

The Client

A mature UK professional services firm with a sizeable workforce and a long-standing Private Medical Insurance scheme.

The Situation

At renewal, the company faced a substantial increase in its PMI premium. The existing cover was valued by employees, but absorbing the full increase would put pressure on the benefits budget.

Simply moving to a cheaper insurer was not necessarily straightforward: employees had existing medical histories and some were receiving treatment. The business needed to understand the consequences of changing insurer, reducing cover or modifying the scheme before making a decision.

The Optima Solution

We tested the available options, comparing renewal terms with alternative insurer quotations and different scheme designs.

Crucially, we considered not just the headline premiums but also the implications of changing insurer, including underwriting arrangements, exclusions, existing treatment, and continuity of cover. We explored whether adjustments to excesses or selected cover options could manage costs without removing benefits the company particularly wanted to preserve.

We presented the trade-offs clearly, enabling the business to compare the financial savings available against the potential impact on employees.

This gave the company a more informed basis for negotiating its PMI renewal and choosing a sustainable approach without treating the cheapest quotation as automatically the best option.

The Client

A Manufacturing Business with a long-serving workforce, an existing Group Income Protection policy and a company sick pay arrangement that had evolved over several years.

The Situation

During an internal review of employee absence, the business realised that its sick pay arrangements and insurance cover had developed independently. Management was unsure whether the Group Income Protection policy would provide the support expected if an employee became unable to work for an extended period.

The concern was not simply whether the company had insurance, but whether the policy's deferred period and benefit terms aligned with the way the business actually paid sick pay.

The Optima Solution

We examined the Group Income Protection policy alongside the company's sick pay provisions, focusing on the deferred period, benefit calculation, payment duration and eligibility conditions.

This helped identify where the timing of insurance benefits might not align with the company's contractual sick pay commitments. We also reviewed the insurer's approach to claims management and any rehabilitation or return-to-work support available under the policy.

We then outlined the options for bringing the arrangements into better alignment, including whether a different deferred period or policy structure would be appropriate, subject to insurer terms and affordability.

Our review gave the business a clearer understanding of its potential exposure to prolonged employee absence and a practical basis for aligning its insurance with its wider employment arrangements.

The Client

A large firm of contractors with an existing Group Income Protection scheme designed to provide financial support when employees are unable to work for an extended period.

The Situation

When a long-serving employee went on extended sick leave, the HR team expected the company's Income Protection policy to provide support once the relevant deferred period had passed.

However, the claim process proved more complicated than anticipated, with the insurer requesting further medical and employment information before it could assess the claim. The employee was understandably concerned about their financial position, while HR wanted clarity on what was needed and how the process could be progressed.

The Optima Solution

We worked with HR to clarify the insurer's outstanding requirements, explain the relevant policy provisions and identify what information was needed to move the assessment forward.

We liaised with the insurer on the employer's behalf, helping HR understand the reasons for the delay, coordinate the necessary employment information, and establish clear next steps. Where medical evidence was required, we explained the insurer's process and the importance of the employee providing the appropriate information through the relevant channels.

We also kept HR informed about the claim's progress and helped distinguish between matters the insurer needed to assess and issues that could be resolved through clarification.

The result was a clearer, more structured claims process, with HR better equipped to support the employee and navigate a difficult situation. The insurer retained responsibility for the claim decision, but the business had specialist support throughout via Optima.